BCTFA AGM 2020

Notice is hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of the BC Tuna Fishermen’s Association is called for and will be held at the Beban Park Social Centre, Room 2 & 3 (2300 Bowen Rd, Nanaimo, BC V9T 3K7) on March 6 2019 from 0900-1700 for the following purposes:

  1. Receive the reports and statements required by the Societies Act to be placed before the meeting.

  2. Elect directors if there is a vacancy.

  3. Transaction of such other business as may be properly brought before the meeting.

If you have a proposal to bring before the association please send a notice of the matter at least 14 days before the date of the AGM (Feb 21). Paper notifications will no longer be sent out. 

Please see the BCTFA constitution https://www.bctfa.com/projects/ for details concerning voting, proxy voting, quorum requirements and other details. If you have any questions please contact us through the contact form on this website.

Draft Agenda (subject to change):

9:00- 10:00

CHMSF Report

9:30-10:00

Marine Stewardship Council Presentation (during CHMSF allotted time)

10:00-10:20

Opening remarks from President Gregg Holm

10:20- 10:40

Executive Summary by Tiare Boyes

10:40- 11:30

MPT report on the Northern Shelf Bioregion (Grant Dovey and Mike Atkinson)

11:30- 12:00

FishSafe

12:00-12:20

Mutual Marine (Keith Chauvel)

12:20-1:20

(TBD)

1:20-1:50

Lunch (sandwiches and light refreshments provided)

1:50- 2:20

BC Seafood Alliance Presentation (Christina Burridge)

2:20-

non-member guests requested to leave

2:20- 3:40

Presentation of budget and financials (Gregg Holm)

3:40-4:15

General Discussion:

·      Logbook fees

·      Observation from 2019 season

·      Tropical Species

4:15-4:45

Board Election

4:45-5:00

Any other business

Tiare Boyes
Executive Director
BC Tuna Fishermen’s Association

IPNLF scales up its commitment to rid the oceans of ghost fishing gear

Source:https://www.fis.com/fis/worldnews/worldnews.asp?monthyear=2-2020&day=3&id=106227&l=e&country=0&special=&ndb=1&df=0

The International Pole & Line Foundation (IPNLF), the only non-profit association that is solely committed to promoting responsible one-by-one tuna fisheries and supply chains, is delighted to announce that its Socio Economic Manager, Zacari Edwards, has also taken up the role of co-coordinator of the Building Evidence Working Group, established by the Global Ghost Gear Initiative (GGGI).

In this role, Edwards will sit alongside working group chair Gideon Jones of the Emerald Sea Protection Society and fellow co-coordinator Kelsey Richardson of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).

The GGGI comprises commercial stakeholders, as well as NGOs, academia and governments, who are collectively focused on solving the problem of lost and abandoned fishing nets, line, rope, traps, pots, and floats – collectively known as ‘ghost gear’. Often, this gear will continue to indiscriminately catch fish and other marine animals, putting many threatened species at risk.

Edwards’ appointment to the working group is aligned with his ongoing work exploring the varying impacts of the tuna fishing sector on marine plastics pollution, with a particular emphasis on quantifying the comparatively low contribution of one-by-one caught fisheries to this global challenge, as well as the mitigation efforts being put in place by pole-and-line, handline and troll tuna fishermen to address this.

Commenting on the role, Edwards says, “The Global Ghost Gear Initiative continues to embark on groundbreaking, collaborative work aimed at tackling the problem of ghost fishing in an increasing number of fisheries throughout the world. Addressing this particular challenge to marine conservation is a great passion of mine, so becoming part of the GGGI programme in a more official capacity, and being able to help drive the crucial evidence building elements of its work is a fantastic opportunity, while also strengthening IPNLF’s partnership with the alliance.”

Working alongside the working group’s chair and fellow co-coordinator, Edwards will help track and develop the workplan’s progress, which has to date been principally focused on gathering global data sets and analysing them to better understand the global impact of ghost fishing, as well as building a scientific resource library, and promoting data gathering efforts at international conferences and policy fora. Additionally, by sharing insights and expertise gained from his close collaborations with fisheries specifically to collect abandoned, lost, discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) data, he will seek to help the group better incentivise effective data sharing, as well as the best ways to collect more accurate, up-to-date estimations of the ALDFG produced by the broader fishing industry.

Joel Baziuk, Deputy Director (Acting) of the Global Ghost Gear Initiative, says, “We are very glad to have IPNLF more formally engaged in the GGGI to draw on Zacari’s expertise, fisheries background and perspective as part of the GGGI Building Evidence Working Group. It’s critical to bring a variety of perspectives including industry around the table to ensure we are addressing the ghost gear issue as holistically as possible.”

editorial@fis.com
www.fis.com

Boston Seafood Show Organizers Issue Update on Coronavirus as U.S. Implements Travel Restrictions

January 31, 2020 – Statement from Diversified Communications Concerning the Novel Coronavirus

Source:https://www.seafoodexpo.com/north-america/novel-coronavirus-updates/

The health and safety of our attendees and exhibitors is our primary concern. We, Diversified Communications, organizers of Seafood Expo North America/Seafood Processing North America, in partnership with the appropriate authorities in the city of Boston, are monitoring the situation regarding the Novel Coronavirus, both in the U.S. and internationally.

The current situation has not impacted attendee and exhibitor registration and we look forward to a successful event on March 15-17, 2020 at the Boston Convention & Exhibition Center (BCEC) in Boston, Massachusetts.

We are following the guidance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). We are also working with the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority (MCCA), and appropriate authorities on recommended protocols to protect our customers and attendees while at the Expo.

  • The Public Safety Department is coordinating with the City, State and Federal 1st responders for “real time” intelligence and response protocol related to the Novel Coronavirus

  • The BCEC has medically trained public safety staff as well as Boston Emergency Medical Services (Boston EMS) onsite during the event and will implement the most effective protocols in accordance with current recommendations

  • The BCEC will also increase hand washing signage and hand sanitizer stations throughout the facility and be diligent about the cleaning of public areas

In addition, the City of Boston has increased efforts to prevent the spread of disease citywide including preparedness meetings with Boston EMS, emergency management agencies, the Police Department and the Fire department. The Massachusetts Port Authority in conjunction with the Center for Disease Control have begun to screen for international travelers through the Boston port of entry at Logan Airport for any signs of illness related to the Novel Coronavirus.

We encourage our exhibitors and visitors to take preventive measures and review the links included below from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization:

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel (U.S. CDC’s Travelers’ Health page)
https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus

Diversified Communications has been responding to public safety situations for many years and has an effective crisis management protocol in place. We have great confidence in our partnerships with the cities and local authorities where our events take place, and we will continue to update our customers on new developments. We look forward to a safe and successful event in Boston.

Please continue to check this page for updates.

Indonesian longline tuna fishery enters national fishery improvement project

Source: https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/environment-sustainability/indonesian-longline-tuna-fishery-enters-national-fishery-improvement-project

By Ned Daly

The Sustainable Fisheries Partnership announced the launch of a comprehensive fishery improvement project (FIP) for longline tuna that will be implemented by the Indonesian Longline Tuna Association. Included in the scope of the FIP will be the albacore, yellowfin, and bigeye longline fisheries in the Indian Ocean and the yellowfin and bigeye longline fisheries in the Western Central Pacific Ocean – both covering Indonesia’s EEZ and international waters.

”Indonesia is a leading producer of tuna, and implementing this national-level FIP, involving more than 250 longline vessels, can make a global impact in increasing the proportion of  shelf-stable and fresh and frozen tuna from well-managed sources,” said Dessy Anggraeni, director of SFP’s Indonesia FIP work. 

The FIP was developed to improve data collection on catch and bycatch, increase the number and coverage of onboard observers in the fleet, and improve research, monitoring, and evaluations for the fisheries. The FIP is also intended to improve management and oversight to the point where the fisheries can achieve MSC certification. 

The Indonesian Longline Tuna Association, along with 14 processors and fishing companies, signed a letter of commitment on 23 January.

“We are committed to implement the improvement actions listed in the workplan of the longline tuna fishery improvement project, and hope to move towards Marine Stewardship Council certification. Furthermore, we strive to make the Indonesia longline tuna regain its position as a prominent product from Indonesia, that is sustainable and that will make all of us proud.” ATLI Chairman Dwi Agus Siswa Putra said.

The FIP also has support from the supply-chain – 13 member companies of Sustainable Fishery Partnership’s Global Fresh and Frozen Tuna Supply Chain Roundtable have signed a letter supporting the development of the FIP. Supply Chain Roundtables, developed and managed by SFP, allow seafood suppliers to work in a pre-competitive environment and promote improvement in production and supply-chains.

The FIP will be listed on the Fishery Progress website as the “Indonesia Indian Ocean and Western Central Pacific Ocean tuna – longline FIP”. 

Mexico's Tuna Fishing Season Begins in the Pacific Ocean

Source: https://fis.com/fis/worldnews/worldnews.asp?country=0&monthyear=&l=e&id=106087&ndb=1&df=0

he National Aquaculture and Fisheries Commission (CONAPESCA) announced that on Monday, January 20, the tuna fishing season began with purse-seine vessels in the Pacific Ocean.

The decentralized body of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development explained that the tuna fishery has great relevance for Mexico for its contribution to the food sector and the regional economy.

The activity generates around 70,000 jobs, direct and indirect, and an average of 148,000 tons of products with high nutritional value.

Preliminary figures indicate that during 2019 the volume of tuna production was more than 148 000 tons and the entities with the highest production were Sinaloa, Colima, Chiapas and Baja California, the Commission said.

CONAPESCA also stressed that, according to information from the Research Trust for the Development of the Tuna Exploitation and Dolphin Protection Program (Fidemar), Mexico remains a leading country in sustainable and responsible fishing for tuna, in accordance with the Agreement National Protection of Dolphins and the Use of Tuna, since the technicians and captains of the tuna fleet are certified by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC).

The Directorate General for Fisheries and Aquaculture Management of CONAPESCA informed that the period of closure was notified by means of the “Agreement establishing a temporary ban for commercial fishing for yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus), bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) and skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) in waters under the federal jurisdiction of the Mexican United States of the Pacific Ocean, and which temporarily prohibits that Mexican flag purse-seine vessels capture such species at high seas and waters foreign jurisdictions that are in the area of ​​regulation of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission for the years 2018, 2019 and 2020 ”.

he agreement was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF) on July 3, 2018, based on the technical opinion of the National Institute of Fisheries and Aquaculture  (INAPESCA) and the Resolutions issued by the IATTC, of ​​which Mexico forms part.

The temporary closure and tuna fishery with purse seines in the Pacific Ocean are regulated by the "Official Mexican Norm NOM-001-SAG / PESC-2013, responsible tuna fishing. Specifications for fishing operations with purse seine", published in the DOF on January 16, 2014, and whose objective is to establish the terms and conditions for tuna fishing with Mexican flag vessels equipped with purse seine nets, in order to induce the sustainable use of these resources and minimize the mortality of dolphins associated with schools in fishing operations.

editorial@fis.com
www.fis.com

Fish populations around the world are improving

Source: https://sustainablefisheries-uw.org/fish-populations-are-improving/?fbclid=IwAR1IxlELy_wTTeVnHsbnJqQhLoJEwQxOjtFc6dmHSupiK_pghzwiWSFmBHU

by: Max Mossler Max studied environmental perception & policy in grad school. He thinks a lot about how other people think about the planet. He is the managing editor at Sustainable Fisheries UW.

Let’s enjoy some unequivocal, inarguable good news: a paper published today in PNAS, Hilborn et al. 2020, shows that on average, scientifically-assessed fish populations around the world are healthy or improving. And, for fish populations that are not doing well, there is a clear roadmap to sustainability. With Australia on fire and scares of World War III, the start of 2020 and the new decade has been awful; hopefully Hilborn et al. 2020 can kickstart a decade of ocean optimism.

Hilborn et al. 2020 counters the perception that fish populations around the world are declining and the only solution is closing vast swaths of ocean to fishing. Instead, Hilborn et al. 2020 argues that increasing scientific, management, and enforcement capacity will lead to more abundant and sustainable oceans. The major takeaway of the paper is that fishery management works—when fisheries are managed, they are sustained. The key is following the science-to-management blueprint. Scientific data collection and fishery assessment comes first, then fishing regulation and enforcement of fishing policies. With the blueprint in place, most fisheries around the world are sustainable or improving.

The paper uses updates to the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database, a decades-long project to assemble data on fish populations that are scientifically assessed. As of 2019, the database contains data on 882 marine fish populations, representing about half of reported wild-caught seafood. In 2009, the database contained data on only 166, representing a much smaller proportion of global seafood. Researchers have spent the last 10 years adding to the database, and with today’s publication, update the global status of fish stocks. They found that, on average, fish populations are above target levels. Not every stock is doing well, but on average, things are much better than they were 2 decades ago. How nice: an environmental story where things are better now than they were in the past!

The paper describes the global status of fish stocks, but it also tells the story of fishery sustainability from the past 50 years.  

A brief history of commercial fishing and fishery science

A very general history of industrial fishing goes like this: before the 1950s, commercial fishing was a niche industry supplying a small proportion of the world’s protein. Then, starting in the 1950s, a global effort to increase food security led governments to invest heavily in fishing—often too heavily. Over the next few decades, it became clear that many fisheries were overcapitalized, meaning there were too many boats, too many fishermen, or some combination of the two. Put simply: fishing pressure was too high and eventually led to unsustainable, depleted fish stocks. In the 1990s, the collapse of several prominent fisheries and many high-profile media stories and scientific publications pressured governments to start taking action to protect their fish stocks. The U.S. in 1996 and the EU in 2002 began mandating their fishery policies to be based on fishery science.

RAM Database: From Worm et al. 2009 to Hilborn et al. 2020

In 2009, Worm et al. was published. It was the first paper to put together and present global fish abundance data over time. It is now one of the most important and highly-cited fisheries paper in history. The data from that paper eventually became the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment database, where anyone could access information about specific stock assessments from around the world. When the paper was published, it showed a general trend of stabilization in the 166 fish populations it reported on. However, it was criticized for mainly including stocks from North America, Europe, and Oceania, painting a global picture with data from only a few regions. Hilborn et al. 2020 updates that work to 882 populations including a much broader global scope. The added decade of data also shows a more positive, upward trend: 78% of fisheries considered overfished in Worm et al. 2009 are improved in Hilborn et al. 2020.

Fish stock assessments

It all starts with stock assessments. Stock assessments are the backbone of fishery management. They involve fishery scientists first collecting and modeling various environmental and fishing data to estimate the biomass (a.k.a abundance) of a stock, then estimating how much fish can be harvested sustainably. Stock assessments are the information that governments and managers need to regulate fishing pressure to the level that leads to maximum sustainable yield (MSY), often the goal of fishery management.

Sustainability has two basic steps:

  1. Scientists perform a stock assessment to recommend how much fish should be harvested.

  2. Fishery managers and regulators follow and enforce that recommendation.

It seems simple, but the last 70 years of commercial fishing has shown it is anything but. Stock assessments are expensive. They require scientific and financial capacity that many countries do not have. The obvious reason Worm et al. 2009 had mostly North American and European stocks—those countries had resources to assess their fisheries. Hilborn et al. 2020 makes a point to recognize the global effort to increase fishery management capacity around the world.

Below is a Kobe plot over time, a fun way to visualize the complete history of fisheries assessments. On the x-axis is the ratio of biomass to biomass at MSY. On the y-axis is the ratio of fishing pressure to the right amount of fishing pressure (fishing pressure at MSY). The lines represent relative MSY targets with stocks closest to the intersection being closest to theoretical MSY. A stock would be above biomass targets and fished softly in the lower right quadrant (perfectly sustainable), below biomass targets and fished softly in the lower left quadrant (rebuilding), below biomass targets and fished too hard in the upper left quadrant (very bad), or above biomass targets and fished hard in the upper right quadrant (developing fishery and/or management needs to get it together). You can watch the egg-looking concentration move over time following the general trend of fishing hard and depleting stocks in the 1970s-1990s, then a slow rebuild over time. You can also see stocks getting added to the data as countries began performing more stock assessments. For a more detailed explanation of Kobe plots and the terminology used see Sustainable Seafood 101, a guide meant to explain every aspect of fishery science in an easy-to-understand way.

What about stocks that are not assessed?

Fish populations that are not assessed and monitored are much more likely to be overfished, undermanaged, and unsustainable. This is almost certainly due to the correlation between a country’s financial and scientific capacity and its ability to effectively manage its fisheries. The RAM database is much improved, but still has very little data from Africa and Asia, the two poorest continents. Fish sustainability is most likely declining in those regions, though capacity-building is underway in many places.

Fishery management works

The main takeaway from Hilborn et al. 2020 is that fishery science and management works. If a fishery is assessed, proper decisions can be made on how to sustainably manage it. This is the roadmap for fisheries around the world:

  1. Build capacity to assess the stock

  2. Assess the stock

  3. Use the stock assessment to instruct fishery management

Stock assessment and strong management lead to sustainability. In 1996 the U.S. reauthorized the Magnuson-Stevens Act to require rebuilding plans and catch limits which lowered fishing pressure and raised abundance.

The Common Fisheries Policy of Europe was similarly updated in 2002 and saw similar results. In 1997, Japan introduced total allowable catches (TACs) based on stock assessments and saw their TAC-based fisheries improve. Other countries have followed more recently, notably Chile in 2013.

With more and better fishery management, the future of sustainable seafood is on track.

Opponents call for closure of herring fishery in Strait of Georgia

Source: https://www.comoxvalleyrecord.com/news/opponents-call-for-closure-of-herring-fishery-in-strait-of-georgia/

by: SCOTT STANFIELD

***NOTE: IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEND A MESSAGE IN SUPPORT OF A SCIENCE BASED, PEER-REVIEWED HARVEST POLICY OF 20% FOR THE STRAIT OF GEORGIA HERRING FISHERY CONTACT Victoria.Postlethwaite@dfo-mpo.gc.ca. BCTFA SUPPORTS A SCIENCE BASED APPROACH TO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT ON THE BC COAST****

A Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) management plan for herring recommends a 20 per cent harvest in the Strait of Georgia. Opponents say the harvest rate has contributed to a 60 per cent decline in the population size since 2016.

The roe fishery is slated to open early March, pending approval of the Integrated Fisheries Management Plans from the director general of the Pacific Region.

Conservancy Hornby Island has initiated a petition to suspend the Pacific herring roe fishery. As of Tuesday, it was closing in on 114,000 signatures. The goal is 150,000. Courtenay-Alberni MP Gord Johns has also launched an e-petition to suspend industrial herring fishing in the Strait of Georgia. For every 25 signatures, he “will be able to stand up and challenge Bernadette Jordan, the new Minister for Fisheries and Oceans Canada, on the mismanagement of herring on this coast,” the petition states.

The petition says DFO announced last October that the herring population has dwindled from about 129,500 metric tonnes in 2016 to 85,700 tonnes in 2019, and is predicted to fall to 54,242 tonnes in 2020. The petition also claims the herring fishery is worth little money and produces few jobs.

Ian McAllister, executive director at Pacific Wild, says DFO’s refusal to protect remaining herring stocks undermines its conservation mandate.

“There’s no real good story to be told on the herring fishery,” he said. “That’s what makes it almost incomprehensible that DFO is continuing to manage these stocks the same way they’ve managed all the other stocks on the B.C. coast that have resulted in collapse and total shutdown of the commercial fisheries.”

Despite a projected 61 per cent decline in herring biomass this year, he said DFO continues to allocate 20 per cent of the biomass of Strait of Georgia herring.

“There’s huge concerns for herring, and DFO just has its head in the sand on this issue,” McAllister said. “Not willing to listen to all of the independent research, concerns of the B.C. citizenry…It should be shut down just based on the fact that the majority of chinook salmon diet is Pacific herring.”

He said the “low value fishery” is only worth about $9 million.

Phil Young of the Canadian Fishing Company (Canfisco) says the herring fishery has been worth about $50 million, spread between vessels, crews, processing plants and sales.

“The fishermen nowadays, with just salmon and herring on seine boats, it is important. It does generate some income,” said Young, Canfisco’s vice-president of fisheries and corporate affairs. “A lot of our plants aren’t going much this time of year.”

He notes that herring provides food for chinook salmon when they’re older.

RELATED: The two sides of the herring fishery

“But some of the highest abundance of herring in the Gulf have been recently, and yet the chinook hasn’t done as well. And periods where there was less herring in the 70s and 80s, is when the chinooks did really well. So it’s obviously a lot more than just the herring.

“The harvest rate of 20 per cent is 20 per cent of the observed biomass of more than two years old,” he added. “So any herring under two years old, they don’t count. It’s of the spawning biomass, which is when they become three.”

Young notes that DFO is not counting herring in minor areas of the Gulf of Georgia.

“If you just look at the science and take the other factors out of there, we could be fishing in those areas (west and central coast) as well,” Young said. “The 20 per cent is conservative. It’s got an up or down variance. We fished within that model still.”

The IFMP is up for approval following a 30-day public consultation period, which is open until Friday, Jan. 17. Comments may be provided in writing to Victoria Postlethwaite, Regional Herring Officer, at Victoria.Postlethwaite@dfo-mpo.gc.ca.

Canada imposing mandatory gear marking for some fisheries in 2020

Source: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/canada-mandatory-gear-marking-2020-fishing-industry-1.5422962

By Paul Withers 

Hundreds more fishermen in Atlantic Canada are being drawn into the effort to protect endangered right whales this year.

Specially coloured fishing gear rope will become mandatory with the start of the season in every lobster and crab fishery in Eastern Canada. The rope must identify the region, species being fished and individual fishing area.

The requirement is also intended to maintain access to the U.S. seafood market by demonstrating Canada has rules comparable to those in place for fishermen south of the border.

The details were spelled out in a notice to fish harvesters that was issued by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) on Dec. 20, and make good on a promise made by the federal government earlier in 2019.

"The new requirements are part of the government of Canada's continuing efforts to improve tracking of gear, address ghost gear and further identify management measures threats to marine mammals, in particular North Atlantic right whales," the notice says.

DFO says further management measures to protect the right whale will be announced in the coming weeks.

Why this is happening

The United States Marine Mammal Protection Act requires seafood imports to be caught under fishing rules equivalent to whale protection measures in place in the United States.

Gear marking is mandatory in U.S. trap fisheries.

After almost two dozen right whales have died in the Gulf of St. Lawrence over the past three years, some American politicians, fishermen and environmentalists said Canadian fishing regulations are too lax.

Without further protections, they are calling for a ban on some Canadian seafood.

Brian Guptill, a lobster fisherman on Grand Manan Island, N.B., said it's all about keeping the border open for Canadian seafood.

"In order to prove that we're not the problem, gear marking is the solution," Guptill said.

The notice spells out the colour schemes to be braided into rope used in all non-tended, fixed-gear fisheries in Eastern Canada. One colour will signify the DFO region, another the species and, for lobster and crab fisheries, a third colour will identify individual fishing areas within each region.

The scheme has been designed to distinguish between Canadian and U.S. fishing gear involved in whale entanglements.

Gear marking will be mandatory for ropes attaching gear to the primary buoy. They are known as vertical lines and are seen as the threat to whales from fishing.

A tracer line — a silver transparent tape inside the full length of rope — will be permitted as an alternative.

The tracer line must identify the country, region, species and fishing area.

Who's affected?

Mandatory gear marking is already in place for some fisheries in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.

About 150 lobster fishermen on Nova Scotia's Eastern Shore will be among the first impacted by expanded gear marking when their season opens in April.

"They're well behind the 8-ball getting to us. There's some colours involved that we don't even know the availability of," said Peter Connors of the Eastern Shore Fisherman's Protective Association.

He said he's not aware of a single entanglement in his area.

"If they cause some protection, they do some good then. The fishermen will do whatever they can do to comply," Connors said.

Other fisheries to be impacted

Fourteen fisheries will operate with new colour schemes at some point in 2020.

By landed value, the most significant species affected are lobster and snow crab.

But cod, shrimp and squid trap fisheries, longline and gillnet fisheries are also being assigned mandatory colour schemes.

The interlaced coloured strands must be a minimum of 15 centimetres in length and, at minimum, will be required at the top, middle and bottom of the vertical line, or every 27 metres.

Guptill, also president of the Grand Manan Fishermen's Association, is resigned to what is coming.

"Any rope that isn't marked is going to be blamed on Canada or any fishery that it isn't marking its rope. So you're damned if you do, damned if you don't," he said.

Seychelles-flagged seiners reach yellowfin quota, cease fishing

Source: https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2019/12/30/seychelles-flagged-seiners-reach-yellowfin-quota-cease-fishing/

“A majority of the 13 purse seiners flagged in the Seychelles Islands have reached their annual total allowable catch for yellowfin tuna and ceased fishing for 2019, an official said on Dec. 27. 

According to the Seychelles News Agency, Seychellois' minister of fisheries and agriculture Charles Bastienne said at a press conference that the seiners collectively met their yellowfin quota of 33,211 metric tons set by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission and returned to port. 

Two vessels were still fishing as they had some quota remaining, he added.

"We are monitoring them closely to ensure they abide by the regulation and stay within the limit as we do not want to be penalized," Bastienne said.

He added that because the fleet exceeded their quota by around 1,500t in 2018, this amount will have to be repaid by reductions to future quota in 2021.”

West Coast fishery rebounds in rare conservation “home run” “The recovery is decades ahead of schedule. It’s the biggest environmental story that no one knows about.”

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/dec/26/fishing-groundfish-trawlers-oregon-california-environment

A rare environmental success story is unfolding in waters off the US west coast.

After years of fear and uncertainty, bottom trawler fishermen – those who use nets to catch rockfish, bocaccio, sole, Pacific Ocean perch and other deep-dwelling fish – are making a comeback here, reinventing themselves as a sustainable industry less than two decades after authorities closed huge stretches of the Pacific Ocean because of the species’ depletion.

The ban devastated fishermen, but on 1 January, regulators will reopen an area roughly three times the size of Rhode Island off Oregon and California to groundfish bottom trawling – all with the approval of environmental groups that were once the industry’s biggest foes.

The rapid turnaround features collaboration between the fishermen and environmentalists who spent years refining a long-term fishing plan that will continue to resuscitate the groundfish industry while permanently protecting thousands of square miles of reefs and coral beds that benefit the overfished species.

Now, the fishermen who see their livelihood returning must solve another piece of the puzzle: drumming up consumer demand for fish that haven’t been in grocery stores or on menus for a generation.

“It’s really a conservation home run,” said Shems Jud, regional director for the Environmental Defense Fund’s ocean program. “The recovery is decades ahead of schedule. It’s the biggest environmental story that no one knows about.”

The process also netted a win for conservationists concerned about the future of extreme deepwater habitats where bottom trawlers currently don’t go. A tract of ocean the size of New Mexico with waters up to 2.1 miles (3.4km) deep will be off-limits to bottom-trawling to protect deep-sea corals and sponges just now being discovered.

“Not all fishermen are rapers of the environment. When you hear the word ‘trawler’, very often that’s associated with destruction of the sea and pillaging,” said Kevin Dunn, whose trawler Iron Lady was featured in a Whole Foods television commercial about sustainable fishing.

Groundfish is a catch-all term that refers to dozens of species that live on, or near, the bottom of the Pacific off the west coast. Trawling vessels drag weighted nets to scoop up as many fish as possible, but that can also damage critical rocky underwater habitat.

In the late 1990s, scientists began to sound the alarm about dwindling fish stocks.

Just nine of the more than 90 groundfish species were in trouble, but because of the way bottom trawlers fished – indiscriminately hauling up millions of pounds of whatever their nets encountered – regulators began to ban all bottom trawling. Multiple species of rockfish, slow-growing creatures with spiny fins and colorful names like canary, darksplotched and yellow eye, were the hardest hit.

By 2005, trawlers brought in just one-quarter of the haul of the 1980s. The fleet is now down to 75 boats, said Brad Pettinger, former director of the Oregon Trawl Commission who was key in developing the plan to reopen fishing grounds.

“We really wiped out the industry for a number of years,” Pettinger said. “To get those things up and going again is not easy.“

In 2011, trawlers were assigned quotas for how many of each species they could catch.

Fishermen quickly learned to avoid areas heavy in off-limits species and began innovating to net fewer banned fish.

Surveys soon showed groundfish rebounding – in some cases, 50 years faster than predicted – and accidental trawling of overfished species fell by 80%. The Marine Stewardship Council certified 13 species in the fishery as sustainable in 2014, and five more followed last year.

As the quota system’s success became apparent, environmentalists and trawlers began to talk. Regulators would soon revisit the trawling rules, and the two sides wanted a voice.

They met more than 30 times, slowly building trust as they crafted a proposal. Trawlers brought maps developed over generations, alerted environmentalists to reefs they didn’t know about, and even shared proprietary tow paths.

Wild-caught Dover sole from Oregon waters is sold in a grocery store seafood case in Lake Oswego, Oregon. Dover sole is a species of groundfish, which as a group have been under strict catch quotas to try to save nine overfished species. Photograph: Gillian Flaccus/AP

Last year, regulators approved a plan to reopen the 17-year-old Rockfish Conservation Area off Oregon and California, while banning future trawling in extreme-depth waters and making off-limits some habitat dubbed essential to fish reproduction, including a large area off southern California.

“A fair number of fishermen thought it was a good deal and if it was going to happen, it was better for them to participate than not,” said Tom Libby, a fish processor who was instrumental in crafting the agreement. “It’s right up there with the best and most rewarding things in my career – and I’ve been at it 50 years.“

Even so, with fragile species rebounding, trawlers could harvest as much as 120m pounds (54m kg) a year, but there’s only demand for about half that much. That’s because groundfish have been replaced in stores by farmed, foreign species like tilapia.

A trade association called Positively Groundfish is trying to change that by touring food festivals and culinary trade shows, evangelizing to chefs and seafood buyers about the industry’s rebound and newfound sustainability. They give out samples, too.

“We are treating this almost like a new product for which you have to build awareness – but we do have a great story,“ said Jana Hennig, the association’s executive director. “People are so surprised to hear that not everything is lost, that not everything is doom and gloom, but that it’s possible that you can manage a fishery so well that it actually bounces back to abundance.“