NEW: Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant Program

Dear Members,

 This morning the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard Bernadette Jordan, announced that the Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant Program will open for applications on August 24, 2020, through to September 21, 2020. 

   News release: https://www.canada.ca/en/fisheries-oceans/news/2020/08/minister-jordan-announces-the-fish-harvester-benefit-and-fish-harvester-grant-to-open-on-august-24th.html

Plain text of the announcement has been added below this message for those of you at sea with limited data.

This program was announced in May ($469.4 million in funding to establish the new Fish Harvester Benefit and the new Fish Harvester Grant).  The Fish Harvester Benefit offers income support to self-employed fish harvesters and sharepersons.  The benefit covers up to 75% of income losses beyond a 25% threshold for the 2020 tax year when compared to 2018 or 2019. The maximum benefit is $10,164.   The Fish Harvester Grant is a non-repayable grant to self-employed fish harvesters with a valid commercial fishing licence in 2020 (issued by DFO or their Province or Territory for freshwater commercial harvesters), and non-deferrable business costs of up to $40,000. The grant program provides non repayable support of up to $10,000, dependent on the level of the fish harvesters’ historic fishing revenue in 2018 or 2019. A lesser grant amount may be provided on a sliding scale relative to revenue or actual expenses.

 DFO and Employment and Social Development Canada have provided detailed information about the application process in advance of its opening. This information is available now to ensure that all interested parties are prepared to apply on August 24th.   If you wish to apply for the program visit the Fisheries and Oceans Canada website (http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fisheries-peches/initiatives/fhgbp-ppsp/index-eng.html) to determine if you are eligible and find out what documentation is required to complete the application process. 

The BC Seafood Alliance is closely monitoring the COVID-19 assistance program.   If you run into problems applying for this program, please contact the BC Seafood Alliance (Christina Burridge, 604-377-9213 or cburridge@telus.net).

If you have any questions, please contact the BCTFA office: tiare@leewardltd.com

Eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna fishery set to become first to gain MSC-certification as sustainable

Source: https://www.msc.org/media-centre/press-releases/press-release/first-bluefin-tuna-fishery

“A Japanese longline fishery is set to become the first bluefin tuna fishery to achieve certification to the Marine Stewardship Council’s global standard for sustainable fishing.

This follows the latest stage in the two-year assessment process, in which an Independent legal expert, Mr Eldon Greenberg, decided a concern raised by WWF about bluefin tuna maturity had been dealt with in an action plan.

The adjudicator's findings pave the way for the fishery – Usufuku Honten – to receive MSC certification pending minor amendments to the assessor's final report. This is a significant moment in the turnaround of the Eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna which has been the subject of concerted conservation efforts for the past 20 years.  

Family-owned Usufuku Honten has a single vessel in assessment, which in 2018 caught just 55 tonnes of Atlantic bluefin tuna out of 28,200 tonnes of the total allowable catch set by the international body which governs Atlantic tuna fishing (ICCAT). Usufuku Honten’s MSC certified catch is initially destined for sale in Japan.

The assessment process identified some improvements which the fishery must make as a condition of certification. These conditions must be met within the next five years, and include one that requires the fishery to work with ICCAT, its member states and other fishing organisations - with support of the Fisheries Agency of Japan - to allow this bluefin tuna stock to recover further.

The independent assessment was carried out by Control Union UK and the two-year process has been informed by active engagement and valuable contributions from WWF International and The Pew Charitable Trusts, as well as Usufuku Honten’s management. This included a six-month formal process resolving concerns raised by WWF International and The Pew Charitable Trusts.

The Marine Stewardship Council’s Chief Science and Standards Officer, Dr Rohan Currey, said:

“This certification reflects the positive, concerted action taken over many years, to support the recovery of bluefin in the Eastern Atlantic and we hope that Usufuku Honten achieving MSC-certification will raise the awareness of the importance of sustainably-sourced tuna with Japanese consumers.

“To meet MSC’s Standard, a fishery must meet a high bar of sustainability and be committed to continual improvements. Usufuku Honten has worked hard to reach that standard, and we appreciate the contributions of all parties involved in this two-year process.

“However, we must be mindful that other stocks of bluefin tuna are not in such good shape as the Eastern Atlantic. Our collective challenge is to ensure the sustainable fishing of all bluefin tuna globally.”

The path to recovery

The independent assessment team found that the bluefin tuna stocks in the Eastern Atlantic is now at a healthy level to be fished sustainably. The recovery of the Eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna has been aided by environmental NGO activism, improved fishery management and an international recovery plan – which included dramatically lower fishing quotas. By 2014 scientific assessments indicated the stock was recovering faster than expected, and more recent scientific models indicate numbers have steadily risen in the past decade. ICCAT, which is responsible for managing Atlantic tunas, considered this recovery plan a success in 2018 and agreed to continue increasing catch quotas gradually until 2020. More about Eastern Atlantic bluefin tuna's recovery.

A small fishery leading by example

Between 2012 and 2018, Usufuku Honten’s vessel caught an average of 292 bluefin tuna per year weighing around 150kgs each. It catches bluefin tuna using longlines, taking a few weeks to fish its allocation of the Eastern Atlantic stock in October. Usufuku Honten has consistently stayed within its quota, which is verified by detailed records the fishery keeps for the Japan Fisheries Agency as well as ICCAT. Each tuna is electronically tagged with serial number, quickly frozen onboard, then securely shipped to Japan where it is destined to be eaten as top-quality sashimi. Usufuku has seven distant water vessels, of which only one has been assessed to the MSC Standard (the Shofuku-maru No.1). 

Find out more about the fishery and how it meets the MSC Standard in our factsheet

The Usufuku Honten Northeast Atlantic longline bluefin tuna fishery assessment documents are available at https://fisheries.msc.org.”

Seeking BC harvester input - Vulnerability Assessment of West Coast Fishing Communities

Dear BC harvester, 

Please participate in this survey being conducted to assess the ecological and social vulnerability of fishing communities along the Northeast Pacific (BC, Washington, Oregon, California).

This survey was initiated by fisheries researchers at the University of Washington during winter 2019, and they have invited BC harvester’s participation to gain a broader and cross-border perspective on how climate-driven changes and other pressures are affecting the fabric of fishing communities up and down the Northeast Pacific coast. Here in BC, this survey is being administered through a collaboration between the University of Washington researchers and the BC Marine Program of Nature United (The Nature Conservancy – Canada). The BC Commercial Fishing CaucusThe BC Seafood AllianceThe United Fishermen and Allied Workers’ Union – Unifor, and The First Nations Fisheries Council of BCall support this collaboration and encourage participation as they see value in this information and feel that BC fishers have valuable perspectives to contribute.

** We recognize that COVID-19 has created many disruptions for BC harvesters in the past months. As a result, we acknowledge harvesters may be very focused on related impacts and associated challenges. We share your concerns. In spite of this COVID-19 context, we encourage you to still participate in this survey and share your valuable perspectives. We know that climate changes and many system stressors have the potential to impact the fabric of fishing communities, and we believe it remains important to identify and address these issues by seeking the input and knowledge of harvesters.

How to participate:

The survey will require approximately 20 minutes of your time and the questions focus on your perceptions on changes to fisheries, how you and your community are impacted by those changes, and your ability to respond to the impacts. 

CLICK LINK TO TAKE THE SURVEYwww.BCfishingsurvey.com

                     Enter PIN #:  2020

You can also take the survey by phone, calling toll free: 1-877-379-9299

 ** As a thank you for your time and interest in this survey, you can enter on the survey website for the chance to win one of ten $75 Amazon gift cards in a prize draw.

Further details about this survey are provided in the attached document.

We hope you will consider participating and we look forward to hearing your perspectives! 

 

There is a safer alternative to the tuna you’re likely buying

Source: https://rosieschwartz.com/2020/07/29/there-is-a-safer-alternative-to-the-tuna-youre-likely-buying/

By Rosie Swartz

“Canned tuna-people either love it or hate it but even for those who love it – many have turned away from this pantry staple. While albacore tuna is a rich source of omega 3 fats, the warnings about the mercury content of white albacore tuna, particularly for pregnant women and small children, have frightened people away from enjoying this convenience food.

Health Canada warns tuna lovers about albacore on its website. It states, “However, some people eat canned tuna as frequently as every day. If frequent consumers of canned tuna regularly choose canned albacore (white) tuna, their exposure to mercury could reach unacceptably high levels. The same concerns do not exist for canned “light” tuna because it contains less mercury than canned albacore tuna. Various species can be labelled as “light” tuna including skipjack, yellowfin, and tongol.”

But here’s the good news: albacore tuna that’s fished in the waters of the Pacific Northwest is low in mercury yet it seems to be a well-kept secret – unless you live in British Columbia. HealthLink BC, the province’s site which offers comprehensive non-emergency health information to the residents of British Columbia, has detailed advice about the safety of tuna fished in these waters.

Health Canada’s website, on the other hand, also provides detailed information about limits of albacore tuna for these population groups but doesn’t take into account Canada’s own albacore tuna. You might think that it would be something our government would promote. In fact, many Canadians are not aware that albacore tuna fished from the Pacific Northwest contains minimal mercury while offering a host of nutrients, including DHA and EPA, omega 3s which are in short supply in our diets.

Canned light tuna, with its lower omega 3 levels, and not a product of Canada, is encouraged by the federal agency as a safer choice.

But Canadian tuna is indeed a nutritious catch. The industry just can’t tell Canadians about it.

They have approached Health Canada to ask them to add information about Canadian North Pacific Albacore. In a letter to Health Canada, Lorne Clayton, the executive director of Canadian Highly Migratory Species Foundation (the marketing group for the albacore tuna fisherman), pointed to key data about this fish. He stated,

 We note that HealthLink a publication of the B.C. Ministry of Health reports that CFIA has tested Canadian North Pacific Albacore and summarizes:

The Federal (CFIA) status is:

Canadian North Pacific albacore tuna (fresh, frozen and canned) has been tested for mercury by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and is considered safe to eat. The mercury level in these fish is lower than other albacore tunas. To find Canadian albacore tuna, look for the statement “Product of Canada” on the label.
**Note: Fresh or frozen BC or Canadian albacore tuna has no serving limits.

So what did Health Canada say in response to the request? They will not update their recommendations as they state their advice for albacore tuna was developed in consideration of the fish consumption habits of the general Canadian population across the country in addition to what’s available.

But why not let Canadians know what options are really available? You can order BC canned albacore tuna online from anywhere in Canada. Some specialty shops also carry it. Or why not put an asterisk beside the information so that readers can learn about our Canadian tuna?

What about fresh or frozen albacore?

Health Canada advises Canadians to limit consumption of fresh/frozen tuna along with other high mercury fish such as shark, swordfish, escolar (aka butterfish), marlin, and orange roughy up to 150 g per week of these fish species combined. But for women who are or may become pregnant and breastfeeding mothers this is the limit per month. For young children between 5 and 11 years of age, the limit is 125 g per month and 75 g per month for very young children between 1 and 4 years of age.

Yet there are no limits on fresh or frozen BC albacore. This month is actually the start of the BC albacore tuna fishing season. The tuna is frozen at sea and is available to order online. It certainly is a delicious way to get in your omega-3 fats – nutrients that are critical for age groups right through the life cycle. Not only is it nutrition-packed but BC tuna is also sustainably fished and part of the Ocean Wise making it a healthy catch for our oceans as well.

Are you aware or have you tried BC albacore tuna?”

Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) update

 Following the conduct of extensive public consultations, the Government has put in place a number of changes to the CEWS program. 

 The Government has extended the CEWS to November 21, with the intent to provide support until December 19th. 

 The revised wage subsidy will be comprised of two parts and will apply differently to active and furloughed employees. 

 For active employees, a base subsidy will be provided that will remove the requirement that an employer must have experienced a 30% drop in revenues in order to qualify for the wage subsidy. 

 Instead, the maximum base subsidy will apply where the employer has had a 50% drop in revenues, with the subsidy rate being phased out on a straight-line basis for lower revenue declines. The maximum base subsidy rates will be 60% in periods 5 and 6 (i.e., July and August), 50% in period 7 (i.e., September), 40% in period 8 (i.e., October) and 20% in period 9 (i.e., November). 

 The removal of the 30% threshold will mean that all eligible employers with a revenue decline will now qualify for CEWS support. 

 A top-up subsidy for active employees will also be provided for employers that have been hardest hit, based on their revenue decline over the prior three-month period. The maximum top-up subsidy rate of 25% will be available where the employer’s revenue drop in those three preceding months is 70% or more and the top-up subsidy will be gradually reduced for revenue declines between 70% and 50%. The top-up ensures that the hardest-hit employers continue to receive high levels of support, even as they are recovering. 

 In addition, transitional rules will be provided in periods 5 and 6 (i.e., July and August) so that an employer will get the better of the subsidy under the new rules for that period and what they will have gotten if the original rules for CEWS were continued (i.e., the same rules that applied from March to June). The employers can decide if the old rules or new rules are more beneficial (in July and August). 

 For furloughed employees, the 75% subsidy rate and other rules from periods 1 to 4 (i.e., March to June) are continued into periods 5 and 6 (i.e., July and August), except that the requirement for a 30% decline in revenues is removed. Instead, employers will qualify for a subsidy for furloughed employers if they will qualify for either the base subsidy or the top-up subsidy for their active employees. 

 Starting on August 30, it is intended that the subsidy for furloughed employees will be aligned with other income support programs – specifically the Canada Emergency Response Benefit and / or Employment Insurance. 

 More details about the redesigned CEWS are currently available on the Department of Finance’ website. In addition, the Canada Revenue Agency will publish information online to help employers understand how they may benefit from these changes. 

Amazing albacore: Commercial tuna season starts strong

Source: https://www.chinookobserver.com/news/amazing-albacore-commercial-tuna-season-starts-strong/article_494c8168-c5fb-11ea-8982-5bceeed483b2.html

By LUKE WHITTAKER Chinook Observer

ILWACO — The commercial albacore tuna season kicked off over the weekend with fishermen delivering their first catch of the 2020 season to local processors.

Favorable weather and sea conditions culminated in a successful start, fishermen reported.

“The last couple days were excellent,” said commercial fishermen Christian Johnson of the F/V Two Fishers upon delivering 7,300 pounds of tuna to Ilwaco Landing on Tuesday, July 14. Johnson was out fishing for 10 days along with fellow commercial fisherman James Plymer before returning to port Tuesday.

The F/V Courageous was the first boat to deliver catch to Ilwaco Landing during the weekend, according to dock supervisor David Moore.

“Right after July 4th, the fishermen traditionally head out,” he said.

Approximately 200 to 300 vessels land albacore into Washington ports each year, with the majority being landed into Westport followed by Ilwaco/Chinook, according to WDFW. In 2019, commercial albacore landings in Washington generated more than $36 million in ex-vessel revenue, according to the Pacific Fisheries Information Network.

Seafood Funding Programs

Dear members,

Currently there are a number of funding programs available to fish harvesters and the seafood industry in BC. As these programs have become available the BCTFA has sent out information to our members and posted the relevant links on this news page. The PHMA has recently complied a comprehensive list of these programs into one document which we have provided below.

  1. The Investment Agriculture Foundation is delivering the Canadian Seafood Stabilization Fund to fish and seafood processors in BC. The Government of Canada has committed $62.5 million to the Canadian Seafood Stabilization Fund to support the fish and seafood processing sector to manage the impact of COVID-19 and to prepare for economic recovery.

IAF is delivering funding to eligible businesses that are active in the fish and seafood sector in British Columbia. The activities undertaken by the applicant will determine the value of funding available and whether funding is repayable or non-repayable. Applications are open to For-Profit Organizations and Not-For Profit Organizations. 

Website Information Canadian Seafood Stabilization Fund: https://iafbc.ca/canadian-seafood-stabilization-fund/

2. The BC Food and Beverage Association is delivering the Protecting our People Program to the agriculture, agrifood and seafood industry in BC. This program provides affordable access to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) that is available to be purchased online through a simple ordering system.

Website Information Protecting our People Program: https://bcfoodbeverage.wixsite.com/needppe

200628_govt_COVID_programs_final_Page_1.jpg
200628_govt_COVID_programs_final_Page_2.jpg
200628_govt_COVID_programs_final_Page_3.jpg
200628_govt_COVID_programs_final_Page_4.jpg
200628_govt_COVID_programs_final_Page_5.jpg

Thank you to the PHMA for sharing their document and allowing us to share it with you all.

State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020

Please visit the original source for the full article: https://sustainablefisheries-uw.org/fao-state-of-world-fisheries-2020/

by Max Mossler

On Monday, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) released its biennial State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA) report; and I’m pleased to report that the question that has haunted me since I began writing about seafood now has an answer: 78.7% of seafood is sustainable.

The SOFIA report is the largest and most reliable summary of global seafood data; the latest updates through 2018 and includes new calculations not reported before, like the fact that 78.7% of seafood comes from biologically sustainable fish populations.

I am ecstatic about this calculation; finally, an easy-to-understand statistic that describes the status of seafood sustainability for everyday people. Fishery statistics have long been misperceived and miscommunicated—the problem has been with the scientific definitions of fishery exploitation—they were confusing to non-experts and willfully misinterpreted by advocacy organizations and journalists for shock value. Now, with a clear, understandable statistic, there is no excuse.

In the 2018 SOFIA report, FAO changed the definitions to encourage better communication, kudos to them for taking another step forward.

Seafood sustainability updates

Since the last SOFIA update, the percentage of overexploited (aka overfished) fisheries has gone up slightly from 33.1 to 34.2%. The increase in unsustainable fisheries has been steady since the 1970s, but the rate is slowing.

Before fisheries were ‘overfished,’ ‘maximally sustainably fished,’ and ‘underfished,’ they were ‘over-exploited,’ ‘fully-exploited,’ and ‘under-exploited’ respectively. In a scientific context, “exploitation” is a descriptive word, but in plain English it has a negative connotation that led many to conflate fully-exploited with overfished. In 2018, FAO added handy color-coding and labels of sustainable and unsustainable, and now with the total landings calculation in 2020, communicating fishery status should be crystal clear: 65.8% of fisheries are sustainable supplying 78.7% of seafood, while the 34.2% of overfished fisheries contribute 21.3% of catch.

Despite the higher number of overfished fisheries, underlying global trends seem to be improving. FAO reported heavily on Hilborn et al. 2020 (a paper we covered here) as a sign that biomass and fishing pressure are both moving in the right direction in assessed stocks. Hilborn et al. 2020 showed that, on average, fisheries with consistent data (implying a certain level of management) are healthy and/or improving. FAO sees recovery on the horizon:

In general, intensively managed fisheries have seen decreases in average fishing pressure and increases in stock biomass, with some reaching biologically sustainable levels.

Some caveats: Illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing (IUU) are not included in this data and would change the numbers. However, if you are like most of our audience (in a developed country), it is unlikely you encounter much IUU fish at your local grocery store. Some data from Southeast Asia and parts of Africa are also missing—several of these countries don’t have the technical, scientific, or financial means to monitor their fisheries.

IUU and poor fishery management are symptoms of developing countries’ lack of capacity. Tuna is a good example. In developed countries, tuna are mostly recovered thanks to intensive management, but overfishing continues in places without the capacity to manage their fisheries.

Among the seven principal tuna species, 66.6 percent of their stocks were fished at biologically sustainable levels in 2017, an increase of about 10 percentage points from 2015. In general, it is becoming increasingly clear that intensively managed fisheries have seen decreases in average fishing pressure and increases in average stock biomass, with many reaching or maintaining biologically sustainable levels, while fisheries with less-developed management systems are in poor shape.

Seafood remains an increasingly important part of the global food system

In 2018, 179 million metric tons of fish were produced, of which 82 million were produced by aquaculture. Total fish production is expected to expand to 204 million metric tons in 2030.

In 2017, seafood accounted for 17% of the global population’s intake of animal protein (7 percent of all protein). People are eating more fish than ever before due to increasing production (better technology and less waste), rising incomes, and increased awareness of the health benefits. However, FAO predicts that due to Africa’s projected population growth, “per capita fish consumption is expected to decline in Africa, raising concerns in terms of food security.”

FAO estimates that global fish production is worth 401 billion per year with 250 billion coming from aquaculture. This estimate is just production cost and does not include value added up the supply chain.

Trade follows general globalized income inequality with poorer developing countries being net exporters of seafood with the EU, USA, and Japan being the top 3 importers of seafood.

In 2018, 67 million tonnes of fish (live weight equivalent) was traded internationally for a total export value of USD164 billion. This equates to almost 38 percent of all fish caught or farmed worldwide.

However, exports contracted in 2019, indicating more developing countries consuming their own seafood.

Asia continues to play an outsized role in global seafood. For example, of the ~60 million people around the world directly employed by seafood production, 85% are in Asia. In the last 20 years, 89% of world’s farmed seafood has been produced in Asia.

A focus on women in seafood

In contrast to past years, the 2020 SOFIA report had a strong focus on gender in fisheries. Most women in seafood live in developing countries and fish small-scale or artisanal. FAO reports that in seafood production, only 14% of the workforce are women. In secondary (post-harvest) production, half of workers are women, but labor is often not equitable:

Gender studies… have shown how women are often assigned the most unstable roles, or poorly paid or unpaid positions that require lower qualifications – most often in the secondary sector – and are under-recognized or not recognized at all in the sector.

Female workers in many industries and cultures often have additional burdens to carry, though this can be especially pronounced in fisheries (emphasis by FAO):

In African fisheries, men are predominantly involved in fishing, while women are essentially – but not exclusively – more actively involved in the downstream activities, such as the post-harvest handling, selling fresh fish, processing, storage, packaging and marketing. These women make up 58 percent of the actors in the post-harvest activities of the seafood value chain. In many African countries, smoked fish plays an important role in everyday diets and is a vital source of income for many coastal communities. Typically, small-scale fisheries processing is characterized by hot smoking and drying processes, where women are in charge.

Women fish processors who use traditional ovens are particularly affected by smoke and heat, and suffer from respiratory problems. Their eyes and skin are also affected, and some women lose their fingerprints, adding another burden in obtaining identification or official papers. The social consequences of this fish processing technique are diverse and can negatively impact the family, creating tensions within the household relationships. The heavy productive work burden is coupled with the unpaid reproductive work burden within the household (child bearing and rearing; household maintenance, including cooking and fetching water and fuelwood; and caring for old and sick family members) and the community-level work burden resulting in a triple work burden for women working in agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture. This prevents women from having time and space to enjoy their human rights while realizing themselves and their full potential.

Empowering women is an important part of making seafood more equitable and just. Aquaculture will continue to grow and, with improved governance, could be an opportunity to promote women in seafood.

Aquaculture is being promoted as a significant growth sector, and as an activity that can empower women and young people, notably by facilitating women’s decision-making on the consumption and provision of nutritious food.

You can download the entire State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture report here.

Pacific Albacore Tuna Treaty Renewal

On May 26, 2020 Canada and the United States concluded the negotiation on the renewal of the fishing regime under the Pacific Albacore Treaty with the United States. Canada and the United States agreed to renew the previous fishing regime for an additional three years, until December 31, 2022. Governments will be administratively applying the regime so that the fishing season can begin on June 15, 2020. The core elements of the fishing regime remain unchanged. 45 Canadian vessels (those with USA68 licence eligibilities #1-45) will be permitted to fish Pacific Albacore Tuna in USA waters, outside the 12 nautical mile territorial sea, from June 15 to September 15 each year. An undefined number of USA vessels will be permitted to fish Pacific Albacore Tuna in Canadian waters, outside the 12 nautical mile territorial sea, from June 15 to October 31 each year. Given the delay in the establishment of the new fishing regime, the USA has agreed to extend the deadline for Canada to provide the fixed "seasonal list" of 45 Canadian vessels permitted to access USA waters and ports. DFO is therefore once again accepting applications for USA68 vessel replacements. The deadline to submit applications for vessel replacement for the 2020 Albacore Tuna (USA68) fishery for commercial licence eligibilities 1 - 45 has been extended. Applications will be accepted through the National Online Licensing (NOLS) https://fishing-peche.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/ system from: Friday, May 29 to Monday, June 15, 2020. Applications submitted after June 15, 2020 will NOT be accepted. The current list of vessels with USA68 eligibilities #1-45 can be found at: http://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fm-gp/commercial/pelagic-pelagique/tuna-thon/docs/vessels-vaisseaux/canada-2019-eng.html Application to replace a commercial vessel: https://www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/fm-gp/licence-permis/forms/repl-rempl-comm-vess-bat-eng.pdf Vessel Replacement Guidelines: -USA68 licences are not married to any other vessel based licences; -a single vessel may hold more than one USA68 licence eligibility; -vessel replacements are not permitted during the fishing period of June 15th to September 15th; -increases in overall vessel length are not permitted in association with any USA68 licence replacements; -vessel replacements related to USA68 licences 1 through 45 must be placed on a vessel that already holds a USA68 licence (e.g., USA68 1 through 179). -vessel replacements related to USA68 licences 46 through 179 may be placed on a vessel that does not already hold a USA68 licence. Please be advised that there is no guarantee that the USA68 licence eligibility may be replaced to another vessel in the future.